Webel: SysML1.7: Port contract matching is Feature-based, not Type-based. There's nothing particularly magical or special about use of an ~InterfaceBlock on a "conjugating" SysML Port, it's just a convenient way of managing one-to-one Feature matching!
MultiDomainControl Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Parametric Diagram
NewtonCoolingWithBlocks Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Block Diagram Components - S0 - DISO Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Parametric Diagram
Block Diagram Components - SO - SISO Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Parametric Diagram
ThirdSpeciesWolf Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
FoxRabbitWithInit Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Interaction - Predation Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Parametric Diagram
SinkOrSource - Reproduction - Starvation Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Parametric Diagram
Lotka-Volterra Equations Revisited - RegionalPopulation Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
Lotka-Volterra Equations Revisited - FlowingSpecies Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
UngroundedGearComparison - comparison Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD) SysML Parametric Diagram
GroundedGear - comparison Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD) SysML Parametric Diagram
SMD_WithBacklash Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD) SysML Parametric Diagram
SMD Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Compliant - RotationalInertia - Spring - Damper - Ground Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
Basic Rotational Components - TwoFlange Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
TwoPin - SwitchedRLC Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
Resistor - Capacitor - Inductor - StepVoltage - Ground Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
Electrical Components - TwoPin Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Parametric Diagram
AmbientConvectionCapacitance (combined) Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Cooling Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
AmbientCondition Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD) SysML Parametric Diagram
MagicDraw/Cameo v19SP3: vs SysPhS-1.1: Modelica export: Direct binding from a PhSVariable value property within a FlowProperty of a Port to an inner value property does not flatten. WORKAROUND: Use an intermediate constraint property.
Convection Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD) SysML Parametric Diagram
CoolingToAmbient Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD) SysML Parametric Diagram
ThermalCapacitance - Adiabatic Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD) SysML Parametric Diagram
Thermal Connectors Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 07. Components [MOST] Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Graphical Connectors Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 06. Connectors Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Block Connectors Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 06. Connectors Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Fluid Connectors - ThermoFluid Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 06. Connectors Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Fluid Connectors - Compressible Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 06. Connectors Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Fluid Connectors - Incompressible Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 06. Connectors Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
SimpleDomains - Thermal Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 06. Connectors Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
SimpleDomains - Rotational Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 06. Connectors Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
SimpleDomains - Translational Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 06. Connectors Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
SimpleDomains - Electrical Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML+SysPhS vs Modelica By Example in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) [tested with the Wolfram SystemsModeler for Modelica] Section 06. Connectors Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
UML/SysML: In Internal Block Diagrams: If you have a Port with a name that indicates a unique role AND and if there is an ItemFlow on a Connector that implies or suggests the Type of the Port, consider hiding the Type on the Port symbol.
SysML: The placement of usages of Blocks, their Ports, and Connectors in an Internal Block Diagrams DOES NOT necessarily represent physical geometry!
IBD: Context for SimpleDomesticInverterAirCon - detailed Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML: Simple model of an air conditioner with a refrigerant cycle and StateMachine driven by Activities in MagicDraw/Cameo Section Slide kind SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
IBD: Context for SimpleDomesticInverterAirCon Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML: Simple model of an air conditioner with a refrigerant cycle and StateMachine driven by Activities in MagicDraw/Cameo Section Slide kind SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Overview of two SysPhS-style physical interaction Port types Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML: Simple model of an air conditioner with a refrigerant cycle and StateMachine driven by Activities in MagicDraw/Cameo Section Slide kind SysML Package Diagram
Overview of flowing quantities and Port types with flows Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysML: Simple model of an air conditioner with a refrigerant cycle and StateMachine driven by Activities in MagicDraw/Cameo Section Slide kind SysML Package Diagram
SysPhS-1.1 vs Modelica: On export the SysPhS signal flow Port types are flattened to remove the FlowProperty (rSig, iSig, or bSig). In the exported Modelica code you'll only ever see the Port names.
SysML/SysPhS-1.1: Anonymous Property or Action names may not be an option if: You are exporting to Modelica or Simulink; You absolutely need names for generated query reports (such as generated Interface Control Documents).
BDD & IBD: HumidifierSystem Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 Annex A examples in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica (Wolfram SystemsModeler) Section Annex A.5: Humidifier (with Units) Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Figure 65: Internal structure of the total humidifier system - black box vs details Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 Annex A examples in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica (Wolfram SystemsModeler) Section Annex A.5: Humidifier (with Units) Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: Naming not very consistent across parts, input/output Port name, value properties, or constraint parameters
The use of an additional «port» keyword on a Port is usually redundant and causes clutter. The use of an additional «port» keyword on a basic Property is an obsolete trick. Please don't imitate it even if you see it in some specification sample diagrams!
MagicDraw/Cameo: You can drag out a Property (or Port) from a Class or Block symbol to create an Association with the Property (or Port) as one end
There is no «port» stereotype keyword for Port or Property in UML-2.5.1 or SysML-1.6. It is assumed to be introduced in some SysML and SysPhS specification diagrams as a custom or user-defined stereotype for special illustration purposes.
SysPhS-1.1: Apparent use of part Property with «port» keyword (instead of standard SysML Port) leads to property path symbols appearing inside the boundary of context blocks (instead of within a Port symbol on the boundary) in IBDs and Parametric Diagrams
Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Recommend use standard SysML Ports instead of block part property with «port» keyword
IBD: Figure 59: Internal structure of hydraulics system (with :values compartment showing) Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 Annex A examples in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica (Wolfram SystemsModeler) Section Annex A.4: Hydraulics Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Part properties, typed by blocks ... represent components in this system. They are connected to each other through ports, which represent openings in the tanks and pipe ... Source SysPhS-1.1
IBD: Figure 59: Internal structure of hydraulics system Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 Annex A examples in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica (Wolfram SystemsModeler) Section Annex A.4: Hydraulics Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
BDD: Figure 60: Hydraulics blocks, ports, & component properties Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 Annex A examples in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica (Wolfram SystemsModeler) Section Annex A.4: Hydraulics Slide kind SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
In this example, ports are typed by RealSignalOutElement and RealSignalInElement from the signal flow library ... which both have a flow property rSig typed by Real, from SysML, as shown in Figure 49. Source SysPhS-1.1
Signals flowing in and out of components are modeled by ports typed by interface blocks that have flow properties typed by numbers. Source SysPhS-1.1
Figure 48 connects the signal processor input to an amplifier, the output of the amplifier to a high-pass filter in parallel with a low-pass filter, the outputs of the filters to a mixer, and the output of the mixer to the signal processor output. Source SysPhS-1.1
Figure 47 connects a signal source to a signal processor, which it connects to a signal sink that displays the output. Source SysPhS-1.1
Signals pass through ports in the direction shown by the arrows. Item flows on connectors indicate that the signals are real numbers. Source SysPhS-1.1
Part properties, typed by blocks ... represent the components of the system. They are connected through ports .. which represent signal outputs and inputs ... Source SysPhS-1.1
IBD: Figure 48: Internal structure of the signal processor Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 Annex A examples in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica (Wolfram SystemsModeler) Section Annex A.3: Signal Processor Slide kind SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
BDD: Figure 50: Signal processing system blocks, ports, & component properties Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 Annex A examples in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica (Wolfram SystemsModeler) Section Annex A.3: Signal Processor Slide kind SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
IBD: Figure 47: Internal structure of test bed from signal source to sink Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 Annex A examples in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica (Wolfram SystemsModeler) Section Annex A.3: Signal Processor Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
BDD: Figure 49: Total system (source to sink) blocks, ports, & component properties Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 Annex A examples in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica (Wolfram SystemsModeler) Section Annex A.3: Signal Processor Slide kind SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
Modelica: Naming convention: Why does the OnePort family of electrical components have 2 Pins? Where is the "one port"?
Component PhSConstants (SimulinkParameters and ModelicaParameters) for vectors and matrices have MultidimensionalElement applied, with dimension * and *,*, respectively ... Source SysPhS-1.1
Component input ports for vectors are typed by specializations of RealVectorSignalInElement, while component output ports for vectors are typed by specializations of RealVectorSignalOutElement ... Source SysPhS-1.1
Component input ports for scalars are typed by RealSignalInElement, IntegerSignalInElement, or BooleanSignalInElement, while component output ports for scalars are typed by RealSignalOutElement, IntegerSignalOutElement, or BooleanSignalOutElement ... Source SysPhS-1.1
Simulation platform data specified in the Component Ports (Input and Output), PhSConstants, and platform Parameters columns are scalar, unless marked with a V (vector) or an M (matrix). Source SysPhS-1.1
Figure 30: Elements for signal flow Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 specification body figures in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica [using Wolfram SystemsModeler] Section Slide kind SysML Package Diagram
RealInSignalElement has an in flow property rsig, while RealOutSignalElement has the same property with an out direction. Source SysPhS-1.1
Figure 22 shows an example signal flow application. The block Spring has two ports u and y, of type RealInSignalElement and RealOutSignalElement from the signal flow library ..., respectively. Source SysPhS-1.1
Computer has ports u and y of type RealInSignalElement [ERROR:TYPO] and RealOutSignalElement [ERROR:TYPO] from the signal flow library (see Subclause 11.2.1), respectively. Source SysPhS-1.1
Model [ERROR] contains a connect equation linking component p2 of s1 to component p1 of s2. Source SysPhS-1.1
The following Modelica code corresponds to Figure 24. It has a model Example with two components s1 and s2 of types SpringA and SpringB, respectively. The models SpringA and SpringB have two components p1 and p2 of type Flange, defined similarly to Spring Source SysPhS-1.1
SysML connectors correspond to Modelica connect equations, which link components typed by Modelica connectors. This depends on the correspondence between SysML port types and Modelica connectors ... Source SysPhS-1.1
Figure 24: Connectors in SysML Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 specification body figures in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica [using Wolfram SystemsModeler] Section Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD) SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Figure 23: Ports for physical interaction in SysML Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 specification body figures in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica [using Wolfram SystemsModeler] Section Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
Figure 22: Ports for signal flow in SysML Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: SysPhS-1.1 specification body figures in MagicDraw SysML (or Cameo Systems Modeler) vs Modelica [using Wolfram SystemsModeler] Section Slide kind hybrid diagram SysML Block Definition Diagram (BDD)
Webel: SysML: Electronics: DO NOT represent a jack/socket as a dumb proxy. Imagine it can introduce some signal noise or other effect (such as buzz) to test it is a physical model.
MagicDraw/Cameo: If you want to show a Property or Port listed both in its corresponding compartment on a Class or Block symbol and as the end of an Association in the same diagram, set the display option Show Association Ends As Attributes/Ports to 'all'
Boundary Ports and kinds of Connectors Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: Webel's ultimate guide to Systems Modeling Language (v1) with MagicDraw/Cameo Section 09:02: Ports - The basics Slide kind SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
If the general ports had both behaviors and internal binding connectors, then both specializations would be invalid. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Unstereotyped ports have the basic functionality of stereotyped ones, including flow properties and nested ports, so they can be used as long as the modeler is not concerned with the distinction between proxy and full, and the constraints they impose. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
For example, if the port types on the general block in Figure 9-7 had behaviors defined, then the proxy specialization would be invalid. If the general ports had binding connectors to internal parts, then the full specialization would be invalid. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Unstereotyped ports do not commit to whether they are proxy or full, and do not prevent or dictate future application of the stereotypes, except for ports that violate constraints of the stereotypes. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Figure 9-7 happens to use unstereotyped ports on a general block distributed to users, and stereotyped ports on its specializations for implementation, but the modelers might have not used stereotypes at all, if they did not care whether the model met ... Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Modelers can apply stereotypes for proxy and full ports at any stage of model development, or not all if the stereotype constraints are not needed. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
The stereotypes of proxy and full ports might be elided in these cases to simplify diagrams. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Using existing blocks with ports only requires knowing the port types, because they define the features available for linking or communication with those ports via connectors. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Modelers have the option of applying stereotypes for proxy and full ports to indicate whether ports are specifying features of their owners and internal parts (proxy), or for themselves separately (full). This is a concern when defining ports, rather ... Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Modelers can choose between proxy or full ports at any time in the development lifecycle, or not at all, depending on their methodology. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Proxy and full ports support the capabilities of ports in general, but these capabilities are also available on ports that are not declared as proxy or full. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
In either case, users of a block are only concerned with the features of its ports, regardless of whether the features are surfaced by proxy ports, or handled by full ports directly. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Typing a "standard" Port by an InterfaceBlock or ~InterfaceBlock IS allowed AND can be useful; typing a FullPort by an InterfaceBlock or ~InterfaceBlock is formally allowed but not so useful, because it would have no parts or behaviors to do anything.
UML/SysML: In Internal Block Diagrams: Consider hiding the name of a named Port or Property in a Diagram if its Type is sufficient to indicate its role.
SysML: Typing a Port by an InterfaceBlock or ~InterfaceBlock does NOT imply that the Port is a ProxyPort (but ProxyPort must be typed by an InterfaceBlock or ~InterfaceBlock)
Figure D.22 - Consolidating Connectors into the CAN Bus (CAN Bus Description) Gallery Tutorial TRAIL: The SysML-1.6 Hybrid SUV sample and specification diagrams in MagicDraw/Cameo (with annotations) [UNDERGOING UPDATE to SysML1.7] Section Section: SysML-1.6: HSUV sample Slide kind SysML Internal Block Diagram (IBD)
Figure D.22 continues the refinement of this Controller Area Network (CAN) bus architecture using ports. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
Figure D.21 is an incomplete first step in the refinement of this bus architecture, as it begins to specify the flow properties for InternalCombustionEngine, the Transmission, and the ElectricalPowerController. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
For purposes of example, the ports, flows, and related point-to-point connectors in Figure D.19 are being refined into a common bus architecture. For this example, ports with flow properties have been used to model the bus architecture. Source OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 1.6
The Webel versions of the SysML HSUV sample problems and specification sample figures use "standard" Ports EXCEPT where ProxyPorts or FullPorts are explicitly indicated in the specification
In the Webel recipe for SysML, DO use a "standard" Port until you have a truly compelling reason to commit to a FullPort or ProxyPort
HOWTO get at and display "standard" Ports that have been unnecessarily hidden and suppressed in MD SysML 19SP3 and Cameo 19SP3
It is NOT true in SysML1.6+ that you "should" always use a SysML FullPort or a SysML ProxyPort instead of a "standard" Port, and it's not even always a good idea (and the spec states this very clearly in multiple places)!
Webel: For SysML Blocks and InterfaceBlocks used to type Ports with physical flows use 'F_UpperCamelCase' [may be combined with acronymn conventions
For SysML Blocks and InterfaceBlocks used to type Ports with contracts use the naming convention 'I_UpperCamelCase' [may be combined with acronymn conventions]
