SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: Naming not very consistent across parts, input/output Port name, value properties, or constraint parameters

This page identifies a possible issue, inconsistency, concern, error, or bug!
One of the ways Webel IT Australia helps promote tools, technologies, and languages is by donating a lot of time identifying, tracking, and reporting potential issues, in order to help vendors and developers improve the tools and technologies. In some cases, we also offer workarounds and advice for users. All issues tracked on our public site are offered most constructively and with sincerest gratitude to the tool vendors and technology developers.
Icon class
icon_class
far fa-sticky-note
icon_class_computed
far fa-sticky-note
Note kind
Policy level
Specification keywords
UML keywords
SysMLv1.x keywords
Keywords

Many might consider this not very important, but the naming throughout the SysPhS-1.1 specifications is rather inconsistent, and particularly in the (otherwise excellent) Humidifier example.

Ultimately, introducing more consistent habits - such as the Webel Best Practice items - will help inform your modelling, and also can also save you a lot of time, as well as making it easier to analyse your projects, and make nicer diagrams that communicate well.

Compare:

mLpH2mLpS : VolumeConversion
toPercentage : PercentageConversion

vPC : VaporPressureCalculation
relHumCalc : RelativeHumidityCalculation
The port naming in the Humidifier spec example is particularly uneven. If you are attending a Webel course or following the online Webel trails please don't mimic that spec sample's naming, please use this instead:
Relates to
Related notes
Related notes (backlinks)
Related snippets (extracts)
Visit also
Visit also (backlinks)