Learn about Webel's comprehensive SysMLv2 Workshop Seminar course!
Webel now has a SysMLv2 Online Self-Study course with self-test Quizzes!
Learn about the Webel Q&A online self-testing system for SysML v2/v1

SysML2.0: Cross examples need to be expanded to include usages with nested features with feature values corresponding to crosses for connection usages (cf. 8.4.9 Connections Semantics: 8.4.9.1 Connection Definitions)

This page identifies a possible issue, inconsistency, concern, error, or bug!
One of the ways Webel IT Australia helps promote tools, technologies, and languages is by donating a lot of time identifying, tracking, and reporting potential issues, in order to help vendors and developers improve the tools and technologies. In some cases, we also offer workarounds and advice for users. All issues tracked on our public site are offered most constructively and with sincerest gratitude to the tool vendors and technology developers.
DISCLAIMER: Vendors do not officially endorse issue analysis by Webel IT Australia.
Icon class
icon_class
far fa-sticky-note
icon_class_computed
far fa-sticky-note
Note kind
Policy level
Specification keywords
SysMLv2 keywords
Keywords

Subsection 8.4.9.1 Connection Definitions within 8.4.9 Connections Semantics describes actual feature values on the nested features corresponding to cross features, and further explains that the existence of these values is sufficient to require existence of instances of connection usages with corresponding cross features (unowned or owned) and vice versa.

But none of the SysML2.0 specification examples or SysMLv2 GitHub PILOT examples actually show this (most only show definition level examples).


Webel has created very detailed examples of such available in a dedicated Cross Subsetting learning module as part of the Webel SysMLv2 course:

Relates to
Related notes
Related notes (backlinks)
Related snippets (extracts)
Visit also
Visit also (backlinks)